Black Holes?
I have long read about black holes, but they never made much sense to me. One of the problems is that they present a series of anomalies. While no one has ever (or ever could) really see a black hole, my suspicion is that there are other equations which account for observed phenomena which do require the anomalies, black holes being the most obvious. Of course until we can get real measurements from the vicinity of a black hole we will never know for sure, but I personally would be inclined to believe the equations which do not require anomalies. The premise for the existence of black holes is that when the mass of a star is large enough, the gravity of the star will be so intense that the 'escape velocity' would exceed the speed of light. That means that light could never leave a black hole (hence its name) and nothing else could either (as nothing can exceed the speed of light). There is also an 'event horizon' which is the theoretical sphere around the star where the gravitational pull just gets to that level which would require an escape veloicty of the speed of light. The theory is that once an object reaches the 'event horizon' time stops and it remains there for all time (until the end of the universe). The first problem I have with that is that the escape velocity is defined to be the speed which is required to for an object to reach the edge of the universe without gravity pulling it back. Time has to stop at the event horizon as no one can can see any changes (light could not get out), but that is not true as light could always make it some distance (if the gravity was finite). So, you could have a series of satellites orbiting just outside the event horizon each relaying signals to the next satellite until the information reaches the edge of the universe. However, that is just one of the absurdities of a black hole. Below is a rough diagram to explain a series of conundrums raised by the absurdity of black holes.1 The only required effect is the slowing of time for the falling observer, Fred, to preclude Fred from ever going faster than light. The slowing of time for Charles at the center is postulated for consistency and the increasing mass of each observer is also postulated for consistency, it is not required directly by the special theory of relativity.
This page was last updated on December 30, 2009